Shakespeare's effect on evolution

Because Shakespeare acted out the language of aristocracy, he taught commoners the upper class language, thus taking away a huge barrier between the classes, making a middle class. They used to keep the commoners down by keeping them illiterate. Now they upper class try to take away education, again. But Shakespeare had to be anonymous, (Shakespeare, is not a name of the author) so that the upper class, the aristocracy, couldn't punish him because their work force was now speaking and writing and thinking as a result of his plays. And thus educated in the politics of the time, gave the working class the ability to talk their way from the lower class into the upper class if they so chose. Shakespeare gave them the language to change their destiny.
Which, as far as genetics goes is a good thing, because once a "breed" human or canine or equine get too small of a gene pool, they get unhealthy, and often crazy. They need mutts and mixing genes and mutations, to get the evolutionary diversity that makes them healthy. That is why breeding dogs for a certain trait, or breeding a human for a certain trait, is "bad," because it is against the health and evolution of nature to adapt us to our environment. How superior we must think we are to believe we know what traits are best instead of letting nature change us as it needs to for our most successful survival as a species.